View Full Version : 2010 Camaro 2SS


FP
05-03-2009, 04:42 PM
Let me know if you want any of these in Wallpaper format. Up to 3648 x 2736.

For now, enjoy.
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681656/640/1681656.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681656)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681572/640/1681572.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681572)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681586/640/1681586.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681586)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681589/640/1681589.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681589)
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681590/640/1681590.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681590)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681592/640/1681592.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681592)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681596/640/1681596.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681596)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681598/640/1681598.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681598)
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681600/640/1681600.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681600)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681602/640/1681602.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681602)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681607/640/1681607.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681607)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681609/640/1681609.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681609)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681611/640/1681611.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681611)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681614/640/1681614.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681614)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681618/640/1681618.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681618)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681619/640/1681619.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681619)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681622/640/1681622.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681622)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681623/640/1681623.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681623)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681626/640/1681626.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681626)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681628/640/1681628.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681628)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681629/640/1681629.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681629)
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681630/640/1681630.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681630)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681632/640/1681632.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681632)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681634/640/1681634.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681634)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681633/640/1681633.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681633)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681636/640/1681636.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681636)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681637/640/1681637.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681637)
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681638/640/1681638.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681638)
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681640/640/1681640.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681640)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681641/640/1681641.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681641)
http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681642/640/1681642.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681642)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681644/640/1681644.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681644)
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681645/640/1681645.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681645)
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681646/640/1681646.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681646)

GTR
05-03-2009, 05:02 PM
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681633/img/Anonymous/PICT0028.jpg

I want that in high res.

ricersHA
05-03-2009, 05:16 PM
I seen the other day myself same color too

Zpectre
05-03-2009, 05:46 PM
That's a nice car, the new Camaro is really nice. Much nicer than Mustangs, though (slightly) not as nice as Challengers. :)

I like the second-to-last picture (car looks angry).

Imprezzive
05-03-2009, 05:57 PM
Ontario? Whereabouts?

Yet another member to add to the NFSCars Toronto Chapter :P

Jimmy
05-03-2009, 06:07 PM
Sweet wheels, FP.

Schaefft
05-03-2009, 06:15 PM
Ohhh, I see a Saturn Astra 5-door, we have the same from Opel, same color. :D

That Camaro looks sooo awesome, I love the color. Great car, a real beauty.

Manic
05-03-2009, 06:23 PM
...Much nicer than Mustangs...

Mustangs would be nicer if they make it in '69-'72 style, IMO.

BTW, beautiful Camaro, FP! Wish it's mine, though... :D

I want this one as wallpaper (max res):

http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681598/640/1681598.jpg

DodgeBoy
05-03-2009, 08:58 PM
Is that yours or do you share it with someone else? I think I might've seen it in Toronto on 401 but it was driven by a pretty brunette.

TriniGT
05-03-2009, 09:17 PM
Congrats on the acquisition. Looking good.

BTW, located in Windsor?

Zpectre
05-04-2009, 11:52 AM
Mustangs would be nicer if they make it in '69-'72 style, IMO.

Mustangs are Ford, they suck by default. (Just joking, though I really don't like Ford much.)

Why is it called "2SS"?

daxan
05-04-2009, 12:11 PM
that's a pretty sweet ride...

GTR
05-04-2009, 01:13 PM
Mustangs are Ford, they suck by default. (Just joking, though I really don't like Ford much.)

Why is it called "2SS"?

To be fair, Mustangs do have a couple of advantages over Camaro. They're lighter, the parts are inexpensive, they're smaller, more comfortable and have better visibility. In exchange, they're not as powerful, and despite the fact that the engine is about a couple of liters smaller, they're not any better on gas either.

As far as the reliability goes, I know this much that Mustang had much better diffs than Camaro in the 90s, but lacked internal strength for the amount of power a Camaro would be capable of.

And I was wondering the same thing...2SS?

NAMETYR
05-04-2009, 01:16 PM
though (slightly) not as nice as Challengers. :)



+1

and the pistol girp... :D

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 01:31 PM
Why is it that everyone else's thread, people are *****ing til they turn blue in the face that there should be more proof, but one picture of him in a car is all we need all the suddone?
With it being FP though, I can believe it, the way he is with GM.

Zpectre
05-04-2009, 03:11 PM
Why is it that everyone else's thread, people are *****ing til they turn blue in the face that there should be more proof, but one picture of him in a car is all we need all the suddone?
With it being FP though, I can believe it, the way he is with GM.

The guy used to own a C5 Corvette and people still doubt him...

t3ku
05-04-2009, 03:19 PM
I havnt done that piece of paper for a single vehicle I owned o_O

Though I might do something once I get my blue Z running ;l

OZ
05-04-2009, 04:16 PM
The guy used to own a C5 Corvette and people still doubt him...

While doubting him is something that can happen to anyone who doesn't know the affected member, Rules are rules.

As the forum section states, everyone that wants to show a vehicle here must follow the proper procedures to do so. If veteran members, who should be the ones setting the example, don't do it. And we let it slide by, how can you expect us (The Mod Team) to ask the same for the newcomers?

Honestly, everyone should abide by the rule, It's not something hard to do nor troublesome, and it would clear out this kind of "post proof" behavior easily.

GTR
05-04-2009, 06:43 PM
Logically speaking, it'd make sense to doubt someone who posts his car as his first post. This has happened over and over again; some n00b shows up and posts a car that doesn't belong to him.

FP joined in 2002 and has 2,111 posts. That's enough proof. Similarly, any other well known member doesn't have to be asked for proof. According to the reasoning, that is.

However I'd say he should go ahead and put it up without getting offended, for the sake of setting an example, as OZ mentioned.

nextgentechnologies
05-04-2009, 06:56 PM
I'm not going to do the nfscars proof if I ever make a thread because paper can scratch the delicate plastic on my shifter.

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 06:57 PM
Logically speaking, it'd make sense to doubt someone who posts his car as his first post. This has happened over and over again; some n00b shows up and posts a car that doesn't belong to him.

FP joined in 2002 and has 2,111 posts. That's enough proof. Similarly, any other well known member doesn't have to be asked for proof. According to the reasoning, that is.

However I'd say he should go ahead and put it up without getting offended, for the sake of setting an example, as OZ mentioned.

Mr Sting Ray automatically screamed into my brain multiple times when I read this....

DodgeBoy
05-04-2009, 07:02 PM
I'm not going to do the nfscars proof if I ever make a thread because paper can scratch the delicate plastic on my shifter.

LOL what's you shifter made out of? Play dough?

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 07:04 PM
LOL what's you shifter made out of? Play dough?

LOL, that or he's just fixing to lie. :P

GTR
05-04-2009, 07:35 PM
Mr Sting Ray automatically screamed into my brain multiple times when I read this....

He kinda got his reputation ruined, didn't he?

Something similar happened to Sage; except he only exaggerated the mods he had in the car. He got ridiculed too. Badly.

OptikNERV
05-04-2009, 07:38 PM
Congrats on the acquisition. Looking good.

BTW, located in Windsor?

Negatory. At least I don't think so. I'm from Windsor and shit be looking like somewhere else.

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 07:41 PM
He kinda got his reputation ruined, didn't he?

Something similar happened to Sage; except he only exaggerated the mods he had in the car. He got ridiculed too. Badly.

You talking about his Mustang or 500+hp Cougar?
Speaking of which, havent seen him on in awhile.

DodgeBoy
05-04-2009, 07:48 PM
He kinda got his reputation ruined, didn't he?

Something similar happened to Sage; except he only exaggerated the mods he had in the car. He got ridiculed too. Badly.

LOL the invisible supercharger on the Mustang ftw!

OptikNERV
05-04-2009, 08:00 PM
Who gives a shit if he bullshitted? It's the damn internet.

Plus he was a legit member either way, and his Cougar will rape 95% of the cars on the site.

FP
05-04-2009, 08:01 PM
You guys and your damned proof! Anything more than this and I will have to throw a chair at you lot.
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1686263/img/1686263.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1686263)

I want that in high res.
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1686255/img/1686255.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1686255)
Ontario? Whereabouts?

Yet another member to add to the NFSCars Toronto Chapter :P
East of Toronto... in GM town haha.
Mustangs would be nicer if they make it in '69-'72 style, IMO.

BTW, beautiful Camaro, FP! Wish it's mine, though... :D

I want this one as wallpaper (max res):

http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681598/640/1681598.jpg
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/1686258/img/1686258.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1686258)

Is that yours or do you share it with someone else? I think I might've seen it in Toronto on 401 but it was driven by a pretty brunette.
Hmmm there is likely another one of these then. No one in my family is a brunette, at least that can drive a standard haha.

Mustangs are Ford, they suck by default. (Just joking, though I really don't like Ford much.)

Why is it called "2SS"?
2SS is the package. There is 1SS and 2SS, 2SS just has more standard features.

This is like having 1LS, 1LT and 2LT.
To be fair, Mustangs do have a couple of advantages over Camaro. They're lighter, the parts are inexpensive, they're smaller, more comfortable and have better visibility. In exchange, they're not as powerful, and despite the fact that the engine is about a couple of liters smaller, they're not any better on gas either.

As far as the reliability goes, I know this much that Mustang had much better diffs than Camaro in the 90s, but lacked internal strength for the amount of power a Camaro would be capable of.

And I was wondering the same thing...2SS?
Camaro SS is superior to the Mustang GT. Although it does weigh more, around the track and on the strip it outperforms the Mustang. The base model of the Camaro also outperforms the Mustang in every way.

Visibility I don't find too much of a pain. It takes a while to get used to the high hood, but after that is fine.

Apart from that, looks are subjective. But I find the Camaro much more along the lines of attractive. I find the Mustang bland next to the Camaro and Challenger.

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 08:08 PM
Who gives a shit if he bullshitted? It's the damn internet.

Plus he was a legit member either way, and his Cougar will rape 95% of the cars on the site.
LOL, again with the internet speech?

anyways, I'm not doubting that the cougar can hold it's own, but as hard as it is to pump out over 500 horses out of a single carbed 454 with a bore job, it's easy to question over 500 horses out of a single carbed 289 smallblock.
We have no choice but to believe it his words that it's a bad car. I guess the same goes for myself, though.

anyway, back on topic.

a key isnt all we asked for. :D

Must be doing pretty good to have one of those cars. Love the color combo.

FP
05-04-2009, 08:11 PM
LOL, again with the internet speech?

anyways, I'm not doubting that the cougar can hold it's own, but as hard as it is to pump out over 500 horses out of a single carbed 454 with a bore job, it's easy to question over 500 horses out of a single carbed 289 smallblock.
We have no choice but to believe it his words that it's a bad car. I guess the same goes for myself, though.

anyway, back on topic.

a key isnt all we asked for. :D

Must be doing pretty good to have one of those cars. Love the color combo.
Oh bugger off lol. I am not opening up my boxes to find paper or going outside again! Deal with this for now.

OptikNERV
05-04-2009, 08:13 PM
LOL, again with the internet speech?

anyways, I'm not doubting that the cougar can hold it's own, but as hard as it is to pump out over 500 horses out of a single carbed 454 with a bore job, it's easy to question over 500 horses out of a single carbed 289 smallblock.
We have no choice but to believe it his words that it's a bad car. I guess the same goes for myself, though.

anyway, back on topic.

a key isnt all we asked for. :D

Must be doing pretty good to have one of those cars. Love the color combo.

Ryan, it's easy to question a lot of things: http://www.streetracing.org/boards/showthread.php?t=55674

His Cougar probably DOESN'T have 500HP, but it's still bad ***.

@FP: Nice ride, man. Good color (Y).

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 08:18 PM
Ryan, it's easy to question a lot of things: http://www.streetracing.org/boards/showthread.php?t=55674

His Cougar probably DOESN'T have 500HP, but it's still bad ***.
Still trying to use that against me, I see.
I was just beginning Highschool when I posted that. it's obvious I have grown older and more mature throughout the years. Sure I've said alot of questionable things when I first got the car. I was just a young kid trying to make something cooler than it was.

OptikNERV
05-04-2009, 08:20 PM
Still trying to use that against me, I see.
I was just beginning Highschool when I posted that. it's obvious I have grown older and more mature throughout the years. Sure I've said alot of questionable things when I first got the car. I was just a young kid trying to make something cooler than it was.

I'm not, my friend. Just using an example that a lot of things are questionable :).

Manic
05-04-2009, 08:21 PM
Camaro SS is superior to the Mustang GT. Although it does weigh more, around the track and on the strip it outperforms the Mustang. The base model of the Camaro also outperforms the Mustang in every way.

I agree with that, but it's surely no match for Shelby GT500. :D

BTW, thanks for the pic.

DodgeBoy
05-04-2009, 08:32 PM
Who gives a shit if he bullshitted? It's the damn internet.

Are you saying it's ok to BS because it's the internet? Where do we draw the line then? Is BSing over the phone still ok? How about in person?

IMO it's worse on the internet than in person because ones you type something up, you left your digital fingerprint and that's gonna be with you forever.

Also, +1 on the GT500 comment. I would agree that the Camaro has more aggressive look that that stands out in the crowd but I still think the Mustang is a better overall balance between the 3 pony cars. The GT500 is the perfect combo which provides the most power for the money. The Challenger is built on a sedan chassis and looks bloated and top heavy.

theo
05-04-2009, 08:34 PM
Still trying to use that against me, I see.
I was just beginning Highschool when I posted that. it's obvious I have grown older and more mature throughout the years. Sure I've said alot of questionable things when I first got the car. I was just a young kid trying to make something cooler than it was.

That being said I don't know why some people are excused and others aren't.
I'm not saying FP's proof isn't sufficient, I'm just saying he shouldn't get off with anything less than the rules, which you seem to disagree with. Try not to flip out on me, I'm fairly sure I have a legit point. Thanks.

-theo

MuscleCarFreak
05-04-2009, 08:40 PM
That being said I don't know why some people are excused and others aren't.
I'm not saying FP's proof isn't sufficient, I'm just saying he shouldn't get off with anything less than the rules, which you seem to disagree with. Try not to flip out on me, I'm fairly sure I have a legit point. Thanks.

-theo
hmm... not sure if I understand this correctly. may be reading this wrong, but are you saying I shouldnt be excused for those posts I've made a number of years ago?

I do know that there are a few of us who has never done what the rules state, mainly because we have posted most of our stuff quite awhile before the rules were set in stone. Regardless, no flipping out here.

OptikNERV
05-04-2009, 08:46 PM
Are you saying it's ok to BS because it's the internet? Where do we draw the line then? Is BSing over the phone still ok? How about in person?

You're trying to get ethical over a stupid internet forum? LOLskis. If you honestly take this THAT seriously, you are a ****ing loser; plain and simple. It's an anonymous web forum...enough said.

IMO it's worse on the internet than in person because ones you type something up, you left your digital fingerprint and that's gonna be with you forever.

How the **** is it worse? It's a bunch of nerds talking about cars and sharing pictures! Facepalm extraordinaire. loloolololololol...

And damnit, IT'S ONCE!

TriniGT
05-04-2009, 08:51 PM
Negatory. At least I don't think so. I'm from Windsor and shit be looking like somewhere else.

Ahhh... The huge front lawns had me thinking Windsor. But, given the number of Ontario members on here... could probably do a cruise, heh

FP
05-04-2009, 09:02 PM
Are you saying it's ok to BS because it's the internet? Where do we draw the line then? Is BSing over the phone still ok? How about in person?

IMO it's worse on the internet than in person because ones you type something up, you left your digital fingerprint and that's gonna be with you forever.

Also, +1 on the GT500 comment. I would agree that the Camaro has more aggressive look that that stands out in the crowd but I still think the Mustang is a better overall balance between the 3 pony cars. The GT500 is the perfect combo which provides the most power for the money. The Challenger is built on a sedan chassis and looks bloated and top heavy.
How do you figure? The Gt-500 is $55-58k. A Camaro SS starts at $31k and goes up to $37k if you add absolutely everything on it. For $20k, you better hope to get the best performance possible. For that $20k you can just get a kit to have it outperform the Mustang again, with a more rigid chassis on the Camaro, it shouldn't be too tough.

DodgeBoy
05-04-2009, 09:08 PM
You're trying to get ethical over a stupid internet forum? LOLskis. If you honestly take this THAT seriously, you are a ****ing loser; plain and simple. It's an anonymous web forum...enough said.

So you are saying we should forget about all the ethics and morals and should be free to post whatever we want? Apparently others take it seriously, otherwise we wouldn't have rules. Plus it stopped being anonymous when people started posting pictures of themselves and their cars.

How the **** is it worse? It's a bunch of nerds talking about cars and sharing pictures! Facepalm extraordinaire. loloolololololol...

I already explained that.

How do you figure? The Gt-500 is $55-58k. A Camaro SS starts at $31k and goes up to $37k if you add absolutely everything on it. For $20k, you better hope to get the best performance possible. For that $20k you can just get a kit to have it outperform the Mustang again, with a more rigid chassis on the Camaro, it shouldn't be too tough.

The GT500 starts at $46k but can be had for way less than MSRP. What other car will get you 540 horses from the factory for under $50k?

Sure I can spend 20k on a Camaro to make it fast, but that's not the point. I can do the same with a $500 Crown Vic from the auction and make it smoke them both.

FP
05-04-2009, 09:37 PM
The GT500 starts at $46k but can be had for way less than MSRP. What other car will get you 540 horses from the factory for under $50k?

Sure I can spend 20k on a Camaro to make it fast, but that's not the point. I can do the same with a $500 Crown Vic from the auction and make it smoke them both.
Had a hard time finding the MSRP for the GT500, so I'll take your word for it, but that is still $10k more than a fully loaded Camaro SS. $15k more than the base model Camaro SS. The extra money makes all the difference in the world. A Hennessey kit can easily close the gap, but all the power doesn't help the Mustang's chassis which is too rubbery to go head to head with the Camaro on the track.

theo
05-04-2009, 09:49 PM
hmm... not sure if I understand this correctly. may be reading this wrong, but are you saying I shouldnt be excused for those posts I've made a number of years ago?

That isn't the point, but I don't see why you should, just because you said you've matured, and no offense to you personally, because it's the same response to anyone else. You did the crime, and your only excuse seems to be "I've matured". Fine with me, man, I wasn't bringing up that specific topic, it's not a big deal really, and it's beside the point. We can just drop it, because it's obviously a touchy subject. No reason to discuss it.

I do know that there are a few of us who has never done what the rules state, mainly because we have posted most of our stuff quite awhile before the rules were set in stone. Regardless, no flipping out here.

Yeah that's fine, it was done before the rules were instated. However, I'm talking about current threads, that rule was enacted quite a while ago, so that's not the issue, once again. So I'm not sure, as OZ stated, and maybe you agree here, and maybe you don't, why some people can just get away with some pictures that they could EASILY have copied from some other tiny forum no ones heard of and no proof is necessary because the guy signed up 9 years ago. Again, not implying anything about this particular thread, that's just my view. I may or may not believe FP's provided proof, but that's beside the point, and it really doesn't matter whether or not I do. I just don't see why when someone with 100 posts comes along and posts the same vehicle, everyone's on his *** about it, while here, well we can just slide the rules a bit because he entered his email in the registration form a few years back, and no disrespect to FP, he's a respectable member, but rules are rules. Doesn't add up to me.
-theo

Sinister
05-04-2009, 10:32 PM
Back on topic, Dont hijack this thread with your petty rivalries.
Theo, Optik, Dodgeboy, MCF. you all should know better.
I should be doing a major flush of many posts here.


FP, nice ride, mostly.

GTR
05-05-2009, 02:24 AM
Had a hard time finding the MSRP for the GT500...
Starts at MSRP $48,175.00
http://www.kbb.com/KBB/NewCars/PricingReport/2010_Ford_Mustang_249036.aspx

osa_mah91
05-06-2009, 02:08 PM
you might wanna read this:

It didnít take too long for Chevyís new pony car to show its faults. The first batch of Chevrolet Camaro SS models have been recalled only a few weeks after the bowtie sports car officially went on sale. Apparently the recall has been traced back to an issue with the battery cable.

After the first Camaro owners reported the problem, General Motors decided to enact a voluntary recall in order to fix the problem. Fortunately, it only takes about 30 minutes to fix.

If only Porsche was so good when they came out with the troubled original Cayenne, another great reason to buy American!

SOURCE: http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/camaro-ss-recalled-already-ar73945.html

EVO9MR
05-06-2009, 06:00 PM
your currently the luckiest person i know right now
also can i request two pictures
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681641/640/1681641.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681641)
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/1681644/640/1681644.jpg (http://www.picturepush.com/public/1681644)

thanks u's

GT5
05-12-2009, 06:41 AM
Maaaan, lucky bastard..lol

Drive it well, and take some pic of its sex positions too..lol

Azrael
05-20-2009, 07:20 AM
i went to the 1st major car show of the year for "camaros" and man the new ones are huge compared to mine my 91 looks like it could be a vette compared to these

nice car through

have you got it to the track yet?

osa_mah91
08-15-2009, 03:55 AM
mate, i'd love shots of the interior and the headlamps on in the night! this ride is sexy as!